Fit-out firms accuse HSE of site safety visit fees fit-up

Aaron Morby 7 years ago

Fit-out contractors claim they are being unfairly targeted by Health and Safety Executive inspectors applying the new Fee For Intervention scheme.

Specialist contractors raised the alarm about the new scheme with three of the sectors’s main trade bodies as the first bills landed on their desks at the end of January.

Now specialist contractors are calling for independent monitoring to ensure the controversial FFI scheme is being operated fairly.

They also complain there is no public definition of what is deemed a material breach, which triggers the HSE cost recovery fees of £124-an-hour.

Chief executive officer at AIS, David Frise said: “I believe it is right that those who break the law should pay their fair share of the costs to put things right but I am uncertain as to how fair the system is – what exactly constitutes a material breach serious enough for HSE to notify in writing?

“It appears to be highly subjective and open to the interpretation of the inspector. Realistically, if you look hard enough you are likely to find a breach of HSE regulations on most sites.”

Members of the association claim HSE inspectors are ignoring main contractors and heading straight for specialists, who they fear are seen as easier targets because they do not have the same firepower to challenge inspector’s rulings.

The Fee for Intervention scheme has been introduced to recover costs from companies caught breaking health and safety laws. But firms fear it could fast turn into a revenue raising exercise.

In an unprecedented move, the Association of Interior Specialists has linked up with fellow interior sector trade bodies, the National Association of Shopfitters and Federation of Plastering and Drywall Contractors to raise these concerns with HSE officials.

Robert Hudson, NAS director, said: “The corner stone of this legislation is the term ‘material breech’.

“How can we advise our members on a strategy of compliance when the HSE are unable to provide a definitive explanation?

“To the untrained eye, it would appear to be a licence to print money. The industry needs firm and friendly guidance, not the subjective judgement of an inspector looking to raise another invoice.”

Interim director at FPDC, Steve Halcrow said: “Health and safety is of paramount importance on any construction site and we’d support any improvements in its implementation.

“However, we are concerned that the current proposals to adopt the FFI scheme could unfairly penalise specialist subcontractors.

“It is essential that a clear set of guidelines outlining what is required is put into action by the HSE.

“The HSE also needs to ensure probity as we see the need for an independent third party to monitor the scheme and ensure it is applied fairly and avoids being seen as tax to generate income.”

A spokesman for HSE said: “The construction industry is a high risk sector and HSE is focusing on high risk and poor performing sectors with fewer proactive inspections for businesses in lower risk areas. FFI will not influence which businesses we inspect.

“Individual inspectors do not have cost recovery targets. Enforcement decisions are made within published and longstanding frameworks which are subject to line management checks, peer reviews and internal audit to help ensure consistency.”

The HSE added that an Enforcement Policy Statement and Enforcement Management Model, together with examples of material breaches, could be found in the guidance for businesses on FFI available on HSE’s web site.

The spokesman said: “The Government and HSE believe it is right that those who break health and safety law, and not the public purse, should pay the costs incurred in making them put matters right.

“The many businesses that comply with their legal obligations will continue to pay nothing.”

Anyone receiving an FFI invoice will have 21 days from receipt in which to query it, should they believe they weren’t in material breach of the law or the time the fee is charged for is incorrect.

If they remain unhappy after the HSE’s response they will then have a further 21 days in which to lodge a dispute.

Latest news

Kier wins £160m Area 4 highways upkeep deal

Maintenance work to start in November on Kent and Sussex roads
1 hour ago

23 demolition firms win places on Scottish framework

Demolition framework for Scottish council and housing associations
2 hours ago

Amey clinches £240m deal to upkeep three major bridges

South west major structures inspection and maintenance worth £16m a year
3 hours ago

Shed builder Winvic hails £29m rail freight terminal win

Vast concrete pour to start in weeks on 30,000m3 terminal storage slab
2 hours ago

Vinci replaces Galliford Try on £26m cancer centre

Demolition work completed by Galliford Try but client brings in new contractor
1 day ago

Aecom to cut up to 500 jobs

Consultant starts redundancy consultation as it "re-shapes" the business
9 hours ago

Squibb lands demolition deal on £220m Woolwich site

Year-long demolition of old Woolwich estate starts this month
6 hours ago

Morgan Sindall confident of second half profit surge

Post lockdown recovery continues as £9.3m of furlough cash to be handed back to government
11 hours ago

M&E specialist Lorne Stewart battles to stem losses

Harrow-based building services specialist begins to curb losses
11 hours ago

Worker crushed to death on Tottenham demolition site

Wall and roof collapses at two-storey industrial building
20 hours ago

Countryside picked for £124m Bracknell housing plan

Over 400 homes to be built on three council-owned sites in town centre
11 hours ago

Balfour to reopen concrete plant after Covid outbreak

Track and trace investigations show no-one affected at Hinkley where segments are supplied
1 day ago

Robertson lands Preston research centre contract

University of Sheffield picks main contractor for £20m scheme
1 day ago

300 “shovel ready” schemes get £900m funding boost

Government confirms schemes receiving cash from the Getting Building Fund
1 day ago

2021 workload rebound but to 6.4% below pre-Covid level

Construction forecasters bank on V-shaped recovery next year
1 day ago

Plans unveiled for new 40-acre Crewe warehouse scheme

Construction of 800,000 sq ft of space on former BAE factory site
1 day ago

Manchester wellbeing centre developer eyes three more sites

Construction to start next year on £250m Manchester scheme followed by trio of new venues
2 days ago

Willmott Dixon wins £31m Rotherham housing deal

Over 170 homes to be built for Rother Living
1 day ago

Gaysha acquires fit-out firm GS Contracts

Latest acquisition for expanding London refurb contractor
2 days ago

More than 600 consultants fight to win framework places

EN:Procure picks 70 winners for £10m deal: Full details
2 days ago

Keep the industry updated by joining the Enquirer Directory

Membership lets construction know you are open for business as recovery gathers momentum
2 years ago

Clancy drops Docwra name and exits multi-utility work

Clancy to sharpen focus on water and energy work
2 days ago

Renaker go-ahead for Manchester twin towers

Phase 2 of Crown Street scheme approved by planners
2 days ago

Laing O’Rourke wins £123m sewage works upgrade

Three-year upgrade of Beckton works to start early next year
2 days ago

Cruden goes into administration with 100 job losses

KPMG now winding down contractor after Covid-19 was "the final straw"
5 days ago

Demolition worker fights for her life after site accident

Shannon Brasier, 20, in coma at Royal London Hospital
5 days ago

Sisk to repay Covid-19 staff wage cuts

Around 600 staff to recoup deductions made over three months
5 days ago

Worker crushed to death at precast concrete plant

Safety inspectors uncover a series of problems at Treanor Pujol site
2 days ago

Build UK contractors hold payment times during Covid-19

Six main contractors paying within 30 days
5 days ago

McAlpine to cut 6% of staff after strategy review

Regional and market Covid-19 review leads to 132 job losses
6 days ago

Contractor services