Fit-out firms accuse HSE of site safety visit fees fit-up

Aaron Morby 12 years ago
Share

Fit-out contractors claim they are being unfairly targeted by Health and Safety Executive inspectors applying the new Fee For Intervention scheme.

Specialist contractors raised the alarm about the new scheme with three of the sectors’s main trade bodies as the first bills landed on their desks at the end of January.

Now specialist contractors are calling for independent monitoring to ensure the controversial FFI scheme is being operated fairly.

They also complain there is no public definition of what is deemed a material breach, which triggers the HSE cost recovery fees of £124-an-hour.

Chief executive officer at AIS, David Frise said: “I believe it is right that those who break the law should pay their fair share of the costs to put things right but I am uncertain as to how fair the system is – what exactly constitutes a material breach serious enough for HSE to notify in writing?

“It appears to be highly subjective and open to the interpretation of the inspector. Realistically, if you look hard enough you are likely to find a breach of HSE regulations on most sites.”

Members of the association claim HSE inspectors are ignoring main contractors and heading straight for specialists, who they fear are seen as easier targets because they do not have the same firepower to challenge inspector’s rulings.

The Fee for Intervention scheme has been introduced to recover costs from companies caught breaking health and safety laws. But firms fear it could fast turn into a revenue raising exercise.

In an unprecedented move, the Association of Interior Specialists has linked up with fellow interior sector trade bodies, the National Association of Shopfitters and Federation of Plastering and Drywall Contractors to raise these concerns with HSE officials.

Robert Hudson, NAS director, said: “The corner stone of this legislation is the term ‘material breech’.

“How can we advise our members on a strategy of compliance when the HSE are unable to provide a definitive explanation?

“To the untrained eye, it would appear to be a licence to print money. The industry needs firm and friendly guidance, not the subjective judgement of an inspector looking to raise another invoice.”

Interim director at FPDC, Steve Halcrow said: “Health and safety is of paramount importance on any construction site and we’d support any improvements in its implementation.

“However, we are concerned that the current proposals to adopt the FFI scheme could unfairly penalise specialist subcontractors.

“It is essential that a clear set of guidelines outlining what is required is put into action by the HSE.

“The HSE also needs to ensure probity as we see the need for an independent third party to monitor the scheme and ensure it is applied fairly and avoids being seen as tax to generate income.”

A spokesman for HSE said: “The construction industry is a high risk sector and HSE is focusing on high risk and poor performing sectors with fewer proactive inspections for businesses in lower risk areas. FFI will not influence which businesses we inspect.

“Individual inspectors do not have cost recovery targets. Enforcement decisions are made within published and longstanding frameworks which are subject to line management checks, peer reviews and internal audit to help ensure consistency.”

The HSE added that an Enforcement Policy Statement and Enforcement Management Model, together with examples of material breaches, could be found in the guidance for businesses on FFI available on HSE’s web site.

The spokesman said: “The Government and HSE believe it is right that those who break health and safety law, and not the public purse, should pay the costs incurred in making them put matters right.

“The many businesses that comply with their legal obligations will continue to pay nothing.”

Anyone receiving an FFI invoice will have 21 days from receipt in which to query it, should they believe they weren’t in material breach of the law or the time the fee is charged for is incorrect.

If they remain unhappy after the HSE’s response they will then have a further 21 days in which to lodge a dispute.

Latest news

BESA audit blitz sees 14 specialist contractors suspended

Building engineering services trade body cracks down on standards
15 hours ago

Engineers pull-off 220m HS2 viaduct slide in 3 days

Five-structure Northants sequence ends with 1,300t deck slide - video
1 hour ago

Managing Director moves to advisory role at Shufflebottom

Alex Shufflebottom steps-down after acquisition by Embrace
42 minutes ago

JV North unveils winners of £500m housing blitz

Consortium gears up to deliver 3,000 new homes across North West
16 hours ago

Partnerships builder Keepmoat names new chief executive

Ian Hoad to take reins as Tim Beale steps down after eight years
18 hours ago

Ballymore to transform former Crossrail construction site

Limmo Peninsula will be new neighbourhood in East London
21 hours ago

Building Safety Regulator chief to step down

Search on to find replacement for Philip White
1 day ago

Amazon unveils £40bn investment plan for UK sites

Four new fulfillment centres confirmed as part of huge spending package
1 day ago

Glass bridge picked for Queen Elizabeth II memorial

New bridge and gardens will honour late Queen in the heart of London
1 day ago

Mears set to beat profit forecasts after strong first half

Maintenance growth and 100% contract retention drive bullish outlook for 2025
1 day ago

Bouygues lands London 150 key worker homes job

Affordable flats planned near London Bridge in landmark council scheme
1 day ago

Hebden Bridge £68m flood defence job heads to market

Market engagement opens on four-year Environment Agency scheme
1 day ago

Housing plans go in for abandoned theme park

Story Homes to transform former Camelot Theme Park in Lancashire
1 day ago

Morris & Spottiswood sees turnover and profits surge

Growth at M&E division helps power record numbers
1 day ago

Redundancies loom at M&E giant Dalkia

Consultation starts at Southern region
2 days ago

Land deal unlocks East London £750m health hub plan

Queen Mary University secures site to build Whitechapel life sciences complex
2 days ago

Aureos bags £45m Howden Relief Road job

Former Keltbray infrastructure business to start construction next month
2 days ago

Four injured after partially built floor collapses

Court hears how steel beams were cut at the same time Acrow props removed
2 days ago

Careys directors sacked after £4m job-loss showdown

Pair win unfair dismissal case after being accused of "tickling each other’s bollocks"
5 days ago

Octavius wins £31m A38 corridor upgrade

North Somerset picks firm for key trunk road improvement scheme
2 days ago

Danny Sullivan Group hits back over HS2 allegations

Labour supply giant confident it is "fully compliant with all tax obligations"
5 days ago

Bid race takes off for £500m MAG airport small works deal

Nine-lot framework to cover civils, building and M&E jobs up to £5m
5 days ago

Mace director joins Wates as Chief Commercial Officer

Pat Fitzgerald to lead commercial strategy at Wates
5 days ago

Rob Perrins steps up as executive chair in Berkeley shake-up

Long-serving chief steps up to lead housebuilder’s next growth phase
5 days ago

Competition watchdog turns attention to civil engineering

Competition and Markets Authority launches study into road and rail delivery
6 days ago

Timber imports rise for first time in four years

Softwood volumes and prices lead rebound as housing outlook improves
5 days ago

10-Year Infrastructure Strategy published

Full details as Government pledges £725bn of funding over the next decade
6 days ago

Korean firm buys part built Hackney job from failed Elements Europe

Work can now restart on 21-storey hotel and office development
6 days ago

Mark Wild radical reset plan to rescue HS2

Senior manager bonuses scrapped and non-permanent labour cutback
6 days ago

HS2 supply chain fraud claims spark ministerial probe

Transport secretary pledges one-year reset for HS2 to end 'litany of failures'
7 days ago