Construction firms slammed for corporate silence in Grenfell Inquiry

Aaron Morby 6 years ago

Key firms involved in refurbishing Grenfell Tower have been accused of attempting to derail the public inquiry with a wall of corporate silence.

Stephanie Barwise QC, representing survivors and the bereaved, launched a broadside against the construction companies involved
Stephanie Barwise QC, representing survivors and the bereaved, launched a broadside against the construction companies involved

Design and build contractor Rydon, its subcontractors and suppliers have refused to comment on their work and the key issue of compliance claiming they need more information or are unable to provide information now.

Stephanie Barwise QC, representing survivors and the bereaved, launched a stinging attack on the construction firms at the public inquiry

She said: “It is inhumane to remain silent when so many seek understanding and answers, answers which are within the corporates’ gift.

“Despite their words of condolence to the victims, these corporates have no desire to assist this inquiry, even though their participation could save lives in the immediate future.

“The inability to produce a basic account of how, if  at all, they considered Grenfell Tower complied with the Building Regulations is itself indicative of the culture of non-compliance which Arup’s fire expert Dr Lane has identified.”

Her criticism was echoed by Pete Weatherby QC, who warned them: “This is a public search for the truth.  It’s not a game of cat and mouse. 

“We call on all of the corporates who have yet to do so to set out most fully their positions in their opening statements.”

Barwise said: “Rydon, the main contractor under a design and build contract, is being obtuse in arguing, as it does in its position statement, that it was not responsible for critical decisions.

“Whether or not others had suggested or dictated the use of certain materials, Rydon would anyway have been under an obligation implied either by the design and build contract and/or the preconstruction agreement to warn Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea if the materials were unsuitable or hazardous or non-compliant.”

She revealed that architect Studio E’s specification had previously required higher quality materials than were in fact used. 

Fire resistant Celotex, FR5000 not RS5000, was specified originally, and the rainscreen cladding proposed for the spandrel and column panels was an aluminium honeycomb core bonded between two zinc skins.

“Rydon was asked to submit alternative costs for Reynobond over Alucobond and zinc but, as detailed designer of the cladding, it would have been for Rydon or its subcontractors to consider the degree of  resistance to fire necessary and to warn if it considered them insufficient,” she added.

“It is therefore disingenuous of Rydon to suggest that someone else made all the critical decisions before it became involved and  it was stuck with them.

“No doubt others may share responsibility, but attempts such as this to reduce the significance of Rydon’s role are misleading.”

She added: “As to Rydon’s subcontractors, CEP, the subcontractor which purchased and fabricated the Reynobond panels, claims it cannot participate at all until it has had full disclosure. 

“If CEP wishes not to incriminate itself, that is its choice, but it is disingenuous for CEP to plead inability to comment on the compliance of its own work.  The same applies to Harley (the cladding contractor), as it does also to Studio E.

“These parties make no comment on the detailed criticisms of their work, nor do they even comment on drawings which they themselves drafted.”

Barwise said: “The time has come – indeed, is overdue – for the contractors and suppliers to clearly state their positions, and also to respond to the positions taken by others. 

“Their stance that they need more than the documents they already have before engaging at all with any of the criticisms made of them is demonstrably untenable and disingenuous.

“These contractors should not be allowed, by their deliberate refusal to participate, to derail determination of the compliance issue, even though we are concerned with blatant non-compliance.”



Latest news

Plan in for £3bn Lincolnshire mega data centre

3.3m sq ft Humber Tech Park will be one of Europe's largest data centres
19 hours ago

Green light for Digbeth 1,300 homes scheme

Warner’s Fields scheme to start with excavation and landscaping of the River Rea
19 hours ago

Flagship biodiversity net gain scheme flawed

NAO warns Government's flagship green development scheme at risk of failure
18 hours ago

£210m M3 Junction 9 upgrade gains consent

VolkerFitzpatrick to start work in early 2025 on Winnall roundabout, near Winchester
19 hours ago

United Living wins 14-year L&Q homes repairs deal

Trafford housing upkeep deal worth £205m
19 hours ago

£400m Lewisham resi-led scheme advances

Land deal paves way for Amro Partners' 1,000-home London scheme
19 hours ago

McLaren gets go-ahead for Grade II listed Leeds student scheme

Springfield House to be revamped and two new wings added
20 hours ago

Piling giant to fit people alarms on all rigs

Cementation Skanska upgrades site safety systems
20 hours ago

Vistry to make £800m profit after subcontractor cost cuts

House builder bullish about shareholder returns after asking suppliers for discounts
2 days ago

Shareholders approve £2.5bn Barratt and Redrow merger

Final hurdle is for the competition regulator to approve the deal.
2 days ago

Green light for £80m Leith waterfront revamp

Build-to-rent homes and student accommodation scheme to be built
2 days ago

Tilbury Douglas clears Interserve legacy jobs to return to profit

Revenue tops £500m in first year as standalone contractor
3 days ago

Land deal paves way for Manchester civil service office hub

Government buys five acres at former Central Retail Park
2 days ago

Speller Metcalfe wins Wolverhampton library upgrade

Full works are due to start in the autumn
2 days ago

Skills shortage puts big infrastructure projects at risk

Government failing as an intelligent client and now over-reliant on consultancies
3 days ago

Contractors face further insulation board price hikes

Cost of PIR insulation boards set to rise another 10%
3 days ago

Henry Boot wins £36m Rotherham Markets job

Project involves upgrading existing market and building a new library
3 days ago

Keltbray hires new head of infrastructure procurement

Lukasz Olszewski will oversee rail, energy and highways business units
3 days ago

Tunnel fit out robot to revolutionise civils work

Costain and VVB Engineering part of innovative consortium
3 days ago

Funding deal for £86m wind turbine test centre

Latest investment at National Renewable Energy Centre in Blyth
4 days ago

Plan in for Manchester ‘upside-down’ 18-storey tower

Landmark cantilevered NXQ building plan for city Northern Quarter
4 days ago

London 25km Super Sewer hooked up for commissioning

Tideway completes connection to existing Lee Tunnel sewer system
4 days ago

£200m Lincoln ring-road approved

North Hykeham Relief Road granted planning permission
4 days ago

£1bn Manchester Airport City plan rebooted as new sci-tech hub

Plan pivots from offices to science and manufacturing campus, called MIX Manchester
5 days ago

Record results at maintenance specialist Renew

Infrastructure maintenance work continues to pay off for contractor
4 days ago

Barhale lands £21m shaft scheme for Thames Water

Civils specialist bags latest upgrade deal on Thames Water Ring Main
4 days ago

Caddick names new north east director

Former Laing O'Rourke project lead joins Yorkshire contractor
4 days ago

Mount Anvil wins London Camden estate rebuild

Deverloper wins £133m Bacton Phase 2 development in Gospel Oak
5 days ago

London Met Uni seeks firm for £280m estate upgrade

A single partner contractor will deliver 10-year building upgrade plan
5 days ago

Top 30 M&E contractors set for growth – ranking

Growth in data centres and commercial refits creates optimism for year ahead
5 days ago

Contractor services